Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Game 134: Nats at Braves

File photo by Mark Zuckerman / NATS INSIDER
The Nats try to make it two in a row tonight at Turner Field.
Fresh off a 9-2 thumping of the Braves last night, the Nationals are back in Atlanta tonight in search of their second straight win. John Lannan gets the nod against Derek Lowe.

Jayson Werth is in center field again, with Laynce Nix in right field and Rick Ankiel on the bench. Chris Marrero starts at first base, and Jesus Flores makes his second straight start behind the plate in place of ailing catcher Wilson Ramos.

Enjoy the game...

NATIONALS at BRAVES
Where: Turner Field
Gametime: 7:10 p.m.
TV: MASN
Radio: WJFK (106.7 FM), WFED (1500 AM), XM 184
Weather: Partly cloudy, 87 degrees, Wind 6 mph in from RF
STARTING LINEUPS
NATIONALS (63-70)
SS Ian Desmond
CF Jayson Werth
3B Ryan Zimmerman
LF Michael Morse
RF Laynce Nix
2B Danny Espinosa
1B Chris Marrero
C Jesus Flores
P John Lannan

BRAVES (79-55)
CF Michael Bourn
LF Martin Prado
C Brian McCann
2B Dan Uggla
3B Chipper Jones
RF Matt Diaz
1B Freddie Freeman
SS Alex Gonzalez
P Derek Lowe

211 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 211 of 211   Newer›   Newest»
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 211 of 211 Newer› Newest»
baseballswami said...

NatsLady - I don't think the shutdown for JZ was too late but I do think there was some kind of idea that he had to be pushed in August. For some reason, after a great season, when he was close to being shut down, it was deemed necessary that he go into the 7th inning. If you remember some of those August games, he was doing well, but left in too long. It was like we just HAD to know right then that he could go deep into games instead of waiting until next season. Terrible timing and just silly. This year should have been only about coming back from the surgery and making it through the season healthy. The rest of the stuff can wait until next season. I am relieved that he didn't really break down at the end.

Steve M. said...

NatsLady said...
Yeah, Z'nn didn't have a lot of bad games, but they came mostly in August. He had an incredible June (42 IP, 0.85 ERA).

So, for next year, for Z'nn, is the issue he didn't go long enough in games, or he didn't go long enough in the season?

It makes sense he was shut down in September-- should he have been shut down earlier? On what basis was the 160-inning limit set? And should it be reviewed/revised?

This is also a key question for me in terms of Stras next year.

September 1, 2011 12:24 PM


The issue with TJ guys is building up the endurance, the confidence, and the ability to get your feel for your pitches again.

The Manager and pitching coach have to read it. On the earthquake game, why put him in for the 7th in a 0-0 game? He was tired. Comes back and gave up a 2 run homer. Against the Cubs, same thing.

I don't think Davey did JZim any favors. Sure, the offense never helped him but the Manager needs to have a better hook.

For next year, I think you treat him like any other pitcher.

BTW, I truly believe given Jordan's "stuff", he is a Top 10 pitcher in the NL. The biggest factor is getting the umps to respect you, getting the defense to play well behind you, and leaving the games with a lead.

How do you leave the game with a lead when your offense doesn't score for you? Well, that is something Rizzo will have to figure out.

Steve M. said...

NatsLady, I think Matteus is still a work in progress. He wasn't consistent enough to be my 7th inning guy. He had a few really bad outings. Now with the injury, who knows.

Feel Wood said...

Losing Adam LaRoche was a big loss considering he was a big Runs Created player.

You would be right except for two big things:

(1) Adam LaRoche was a big second-half Runs Created player, so even if he hadn't been hurt he wouldn't have created many runs in the first half.

(2) Adam LaRoche being in the lineup was keeping Michael Morse out of the lineup, and Morse has to be a bigger run creator than LaRoche - especially first-half LaRoche. Had LaRoche not gotten hurt and removed himself from the lineup, it's doubtful that Riggleman ever would have figured out that he needed to have both LaRoche and Morse in there every day.

With LaRoche presumably healthy and back to form and with a more enlightened manager filling out the lineup card it looks like this will not be a problem in 2012.

Feel Wood said...

Sorted from worst to best:

Name WPA
Sean Burnett -1.59
Collin Balester -0.88
Doug Slaten -0.88
Henry Rodriguez -0.67
Craig Stammen -0.37
Brian Broderick -0.35
Chad Gaudin -0.28
Tom Gorzelanny -0.06
Ryan Mattheus 0.06
Cole Kimball 0.27
Todd Coffey 0.32
Ross Detwiler 0.44
Drew Storen 2.32
Tyler Clippard 4.84


Unless this data is normalized over a per-appearance or per-inning basis it tells you nothing. And it appears not to be normalized since Slaten and Gaudin (for example) have less than half the appearances of Burnett and they performed much worse than Burnett in most of them.

And even if you did normalize the data it would still be useless due to the large variance in sample sizes. Balester, Stammen, Gorzelanny, Kimball, Detwiler, etc have too few appaearances to reach any valid conclusion using this data.

A DC Wonk said...

Re: JZ and the 160 IP limit.

My understanding is that by mid-season everybody knew that he was totally recovered, and only needed to build stamina. That's what the "try to go 7 innings" bit was.

As for the 160 limit, my vague recollection is that there is somewhat compelling data about how many innings a young pitcher should pitch in relation to prior years and slowly building up season-long endurance.

In other words -- and this is key to answering both questions: it's quite possible that he could have gone 190-200 innings this year, and be fine -- for this year. But that the stress of 200 innings this year would show up next year.

This is a key, but somewhat subtle point. If I remember correctly, the year the Marlins made it to the Series, they had a number of young pitchers in their starting rotation, and kept riding them all the way to the playoffs. The pitchers for the most part did fine. That year. But the next year (or two?) I think three (possibly two) of the pitcher had bum arms.

So -- again, if I remember all this correctly -- the current theory is that pushing JZ into 7 or 8 innings was OK, it's that pushing him much past 160 would be harmful to him in the long run.

A DC Wonk said...

Oh, and to answer NatsLady's other question about how this bodes for SS -- same deal. I think there will be a 160 IP limit on him, just like JZ this year.

N. Cognito said...

Away from the board less than a day and it's gone into full blown over-analysis mode.

jd said...

To piggy back on DC's point; maturing young pitchers particularly stud pitchers like Znn is the trickiest business. The innings limit has less to do with the TJ surgery and more to do with the fact that he has never pitched that many innings.

It is very prudent to err on the side of caution and it is advisable not to have Dusty (butcher) Baker as your manager. I cringe every time I see 23 year old Mike Leake throw 120 pitches. If my son was a top flight pitcher and he was drafted by the Reds I'd decline to sign and I'd have him take his chances the following year.

N. Cognito said...

"If my son was a top flight pitcher and he was drafted by the Reds I'd decline to sign and I'd have him take his chances the following year."

It's obvious that you love your son.

Mark'd said...

JD, good point on Leake, he burned out before the season was over last year.

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 211 of 211 Newer› Newest» «Oldest ‹Older   201 – 211 of 211   Newer› Newest»

Post a Comment