Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Game 152: Nats at Phillies

File photo by Mark Zuckerman / NATS INSIDER
Tommy Milone faces the Phillies in Game 1 of today's doubleheader.
Remember when the Nationals' scheduled series finale at Citizens Bank Park on Aug. 14 was rained out? Well, they're back in Philadelphia today for an attempted day-night doubleheader to make up for that postponement. Problem is, the forecast for this afternoon's opener isn't so great (though it's supposed to clear up tonight).

If and when they get this first game underway, the Nationals will be fielding an, um, interesting lineup. Ryan Zimmerman, Michael Morse and Jayson Werth all have this game off (presumably they'll start the nightcap). That leaves a heart of the order boasting Rick Ankiel, Chris Marrero and Laynce Nix. Yep.

Fortunately, the Phillies (who clinched their fifth straight NL East title on Saturday) are playing a ton of backups as well. They're sending Kyle Kendrick to the mound today (though Cliff Lee is slated to go tonight).

I'm not in Philadelphia for this series, so enjoy the game and the conversation...

NATIONALS at PHILLIES (Game 1)
Where: Citizens Bank Park
Gametime: 1:05 p.m.
TV: MASN
Radio: WFED (1500 AM), WHFS (1580 AM), XM 185
Weather: Chance of storms, 70 degrees, Wind 9 mph out to RF
STARTING LINEUPS
NATIONALS (72-79)
SS Ian Desmond
RF Roger Bernadina
CF Rick Ankiel
1B Chris Marrero
LF Laynce Nix
2B Danny Espinosa
C Jesus Flores
3B Steve Lombardozzi
P Tommy Milone

PHILLIES (98-54)
CF Shane Victorino
SS Wilson Valdez
1B John Mayberry Jr.
RF Hunter Pence
LF Ben Francisco
C Erik Kratz
2B Pete Orr
3B Michael Martinez
P Kyle Kendrick

157 comments:

  1. Maybe Jesus will save us and bang out three HRs...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh noooooooo.....Werth not playing. We can't possibly win now

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like a spring training lineup on both sides. I'd be interested to know what Davey's thinking is on resting all the big guns at the same time. Did he and Charlie Manuel strike a deal: "I'll sit Zim, Morse, and Werth, if you'll sit Utley, Howard and Ibanez.... You'll throw in Polanco too, if I'll rest Ramos? Ok, deal."

    I'd actually like to see Lombardozzi start each game from here on in. Not sure what more we need to see from Desi or Espi, and we really need to see whether he's ready to hit at the MLB level. So far, the signs aren't that good.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, look everybody, it's Pete Orr!

    I guess since Philly's clinched, and we're out of it, both teams are phoning it in. Either way, we only get 10 of these games left, might as well enjoy them...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is it Spring Training already? Why not reverse it and go with the "A" lineup for the 1st game and give it up for the game against Cliff Lee?

    ReplyDelete
  6. How much crowd are you going to have on a drizzly day for the first game of a doubleheader? Fine with me to have the "B" lineup.

    Not only would I like to see more at-bats from Lombo, I'd like to see how he fields at third. Not that RZ is going anywhere, but maybe Lombo is Jerry Hairston, Jr. next year.

    ReplyDelete
  7. P2P,

    Also they want all the righties in against Lee in the night game.

    ReplyDelete
  8. jd, against Lee? It matters and still doesn't matter if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Heck, the big guns haven't been doing it anyway. The other night it was Ramos who was the sole contributor to the offense in a losing cause. Then, in their win, the main man was Marrero. Werth is more like a cap gun or water pistol, while the other two are not rising to the occasion either. (lately)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here is another topic: Is McCatty gone next season?

    Over on the Nats Blog, in a discussion of Craig Stammen, I found this throwaway line

    ...Steve McCatty (say goodbye while you can)...

    ReplyDelete
  11. ARK Z...Will you finish with the team on the road, as they close the season, next week?
    Grandstander, I saw that name and asked myself, "Is that our old Pete Orr?" Like there could be two.

    I thought everyone like McCatty. Why would they be getting rid of him?

    I am betting that Davey is resting up the A team in order to have a nice sprint to the finish. But what do I know? I still think we should be keeping Livan. ;-)

    GYFNG! If, you know, it's not raining outside.

    PS Capcha is hoptu. Okay.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ummm... that first question was for MARK Z. I have no idea who that ARK guy would be.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Phil Wood thinks McCatty's job is secure (FWIW). But I recall some mention of friction between Davey and Cat, and Davey not wanting to follow Cat's advice on bullpen management.

    Quelle surpise after "seeing what he had out there" and experimenting, Davey's ended up managing the bullpen very similarly to how Riggs did (one inning per guy), except for the platooning of Gorzy with Wang/Stras/Peacock/Milone when needed--a situation Riggs didn't have. Remember when the rotation was unbelievably stable, remember those days...?

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/sports/teams/nationals/2011/09/phil-wood-mccatty-nats-shot-arm

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'd watch out for Pete Orr. He's got things to prove to Rizzo.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Whoever's idea it was to have Balester throw a third inning on Saturday night with six fresh guys still in the bullpen ought to have his job in jeopardy, or at least be asked by the media for his rationale, seems to me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. On another topic -

    You know you've watched too many Nats games on MASN when your 9 year old son spontaneously breaks into a passable imitation of the train station solo flash mob dance from the AT&T commercial.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 222, agree. Unfortunately, I doubt we'll ever know whether that was Cat's recommendation or Davey's call straight up. I kind of suspect Davey because of his long reliever philosophy--a "long" reliever should be able to go three.

    It's clear Davey is managing Clip very carefully, but that still left five guys, with an off-day on Monday...On the other hand, if someone else goes in, with our offense we could still be playing that game on Monday.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You know, if they're determined to keep Desmond at shortstop as much as they seem to be, and are looking for a leadoff guy to play center field, why not start teaching Lombardozzi to play center? Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. They'll nevah NEVAH nevah have new adds!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Navy - ha. No new ads??? How about a new contract so I can buy an Ipad and WATCH BASEBALL GAMES ON IT???????? (Nationals baseball games, I mean).

    MASN/MLB -- catch up with technology. I don't even have a TV anymore (computer is my TV) and are you walking around with a cable or satellite dish on you?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Will be interesting to see what coaches Davey brings back if he returns next year as manager. Just another indictment of "Sad Man" He threw all his coaches and families under the bus when he quit

    ReplyDelete
  23. How come Philly doesn't having a view of parking lots out past centerfield? They couldn't afford them? Ha! Just one more thing we have over Philly. Parking lots to hang big signs on.
    GYFSNG
    soggy

    captcha - ectsi, the feeling you get when we win in Philly

    ReplyDelete
  24. Davey on the radio-- Wants CMW back, satisfied with him as he is now. ("Of course, it's an organizational decision.").

    Barring some problem in the winter, we are seeing CMW next year.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It doesn't matter who Davy wants, McCatty is gone, by his own choice. He can get a job without making a phone call. Though, after this roller-coaster season I hope he waits 5 minutes before making a decision.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Dawn, I didn't know that McCatty had decided to go. Agree he could have a job on just about any team--I wish he would stay, he would have a great pitching staff to coach.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Milone getting ahead in counts and gets out of a jam. Good going so far, kid.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Does Lombardozzi have much experience at 3B?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Foolio-- no. Looks like he's played one game in the minors at 3B.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lombar002ste

    ReplyDelete
  30. Foolio said...
    Does Lombardozzi have much experience at 3B?

    September 20, 2011 1:26 PM


    Not much.

    ReplyDelete
  31. NatsLady said...
    Davey on the radio-- Wants CMW back, satisfied with him as he is now. ("Of course, it's an organizational decision.").

    Barring some problem in the winter, we are seeing CMW next year.

    September 20, 2011 12:57 PM


    Based on the consensus of posters on the previous thread, it seems the majority would say Wang is an upgrade over Lannan.

    Looks like JZim, Stras, Wang, with a a veteran lefty, and a pick 'em of Lannan/Milone/Peacock for the 5th spot.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hey NatsLady, one thing you've consistently said (and I paraphrase) is to pay no attention to what Davey says.
    And I completely agree with this.
    Davey saying he wants CMW back means nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Sign of a good hitter/bunter-- Davey lets Milone take a cut at the first pitch, trusting him to get the bunt if he doesn't get a hit.

    ReplyDelete
  34. There you go again. 1 clutch hit by Bernadina and then Ankiel grounds out with bases loaded.

    Like I said, it isn't as much the OBP as it is clutch hitting. Increase both, and you have a winning record.

    ReplyDelete
  35. sunderland, I thought of that after I posted, and you are right. Nevertheless, haven't heard him say that about Lannan. Maybe he slipped up and said something he actually meant. :)

    Nice play by Lombo, looked like RZ over there at 3B.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Steve M, yeah, after the guy misses your foul ball you are supposed to take advantage.

    Did you see the graphic they put up about Pence, his BA and HR's with runners on base compared to empty bases? And people say there is no such thing as "clutch" hitting.

    ReplyDelete
  37. It just doesn't make sense to me that we invested 2 years in CMW rehab only to let him go just when it looks like he might be effective again.

    ReplyDelete
  38. jd, we are not going to let him go (unless the price is too high, which CMW has not indicated). That's why I feel we have three places in the rotation set and we now have to look seriously at the lefties--ours and the ones we could reasonably obtain.

    ReplyDelete
  39. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Nats Lady,

    Its Lannan or Milone. I know Detwiler is in the mix but I agree with Steve M. that he simply doesn't have the make up and body type for a starting pitcher. I wouldn't mind giving Peacock a real shot at # 5 and if he needs more seasoning there's always Livo (I hope not).

    ReplyDelete
  41. I feel good about CMW re-signing here, and I have have better vibes about Peacock than the other options. I'm ready to commit Detwiler and Stammen to the bullpen as well.
    I love that Tom Milone is now Tommy.

    ReplyDelete
  42. NatsLady said...
    Steve M, yeah, after the guy misses your foul ball you are supposed to take advantage.

    Did you see the graphic they put up about Pence, his BA and HR's with runners on base compared to empty bases? And people say there is no such thing as "clutch" hitting.

    September 20, 2011 1:54 PM


    Anyone that hits better with RISP than non-RBI opportunities is clutch in my book.

    I understand everyone's love of OBP and I point to the Mets and Astros as 2 clubs that don't have a good ratio of OBP to runs scored. The Nats are actually slightly above average in clutch hits.

    The Nats appear to be the worst in the league in add-on runs. They can score all their runs in 1 inning and go the rest of the game with no runs added.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I don't mind Wandy but I wouldn't go crazy to obtain him. Keep in mind that there's a lot coming through our pipe line ( kind of like the Rays) in the next few years.

    ReplyDelete
  44. sunderland said...
    Hey NatsLady, one thing you've consistently said (and I paraphrase) is to pay no attention to what Davey says.
    And I completely agree with this.
    Davey saying he wants CMW back means nothing.

    September 20, 2011 1:43 PM

    Hilarious. Cannot have it both ways!

    ReplyDelete
  45. I really like the fact that Milone doesn't walk anyone. It's kind of a prerequisite if your fastball tops at 88 mph.

    ReplyDelete
  46. jd said...
    I don't mind Wandy but I wouldn't go crazy to obtain him. Keep in mind that there's a lot coming through our pipe line ( kind of like the Rays) in the next few years.

    September 20, 2011 2:07 PM


    JD, I don't think it would take more than a young starting pitcher and another position player that is MLB quality.

    Hunter Pence and Michael Bourn departed for reasonable trade value. Disappointing the Nats couldn't get Bourn when he was available.

    ReplyDelete
  47. A mea culpa and a stats/logic query:

    In a quick post yesterday, I asserted that if the 2011 Nats’ starting pitchers had received even ‘league average’ run support they would have won a lot more games. This morning I got to wondering what sort of run support Lannan, Livo, JZimm, and the other Nats’ starters were actually getting. At ESPN.com, I found the following “Run Support” nine-inning averages listed for the Nats who have had at least 20 starts:

    Marquis (includes his couple of starts with Arizona): 8.66
    Livo: 5.75
    Lannan: 5.70
    Zimmermann: 4.80

    For starters with fewer than 20 starts the numbers are certainly less meaningful, but nevertheless are:

    Milone: 12.64
    Strasburg: 7.71
    CMW: 6.23
    Gorzelany: 4.49
    Detwiler: 3.76
    Peacock: 2.84

    So, first, I admit I was wrong in suggesting that Livo, Lannan, and even Zimmermann would have done better simply by getting league average run support, particularly given that NL teams seem to be averaging only about 4.1 runs per game this year.

    Second, my stats/logic query to those of you so inclined, is this: “What am I missing here?” I know that there’s not going to be a perfect relationship between ERA and run support (RS) on the one hand, and W-L record on the other. But the Nats’ relationships seem out of whack, with the exception of Marquis:

    Marquis: ERA: 4:43, RS: 8.66, W-L: 8-6;
    JZimm: ERA: 3.18, RS: 4.80, W-L: 8-11;
    Lannan: ERA: 3.68, RS: 5.70, W-L: 9-13; and
    Livo: ERA: 4.47, RS: 5.75, W-L: 8-13.

    It would seem to me that if your ERA were better than a full run below your RS -- as it is for JZimm, Lannan, and Livo -- your W-L record should be better than or at least right at .500. If it were just one pitcher with such disparities I’d write it off to randomness. But all three? Is it the problems the Nats’ have had with long and middle relievers? Is it that ever-elusive ‘clutch hitting’? Is it just dumb luck?

    (P.S. - I also note that the Nats’ starters have a fair number of ‘no decisions’: maybe that’s part of the equation?)

    ReplyDelete
  48. Remind me why we didn't go seriously for Pence (after he won the All-Star Game for Clip)?

    According to Charlie and Dave Milone threw a fastball at 92. Maybe the wind helped it along? Oh, no wind today.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Off to work. Tommy looking very pro out there, not flustered by bloop hits, fielder's error, or hitting a guy. Gets some RUNS, willya????

    ReplyDelete
  50. That is a puzzlement, Eugene. Here's the first thing I noticed: for the pitchers, you're looking at earned runs, but for the batters, I assume it's counting all runs. That will explain part of the difference, but not enough, I don't think.

    Frankly, I wonder whether those run support numbers are screwy. Here's why: the Nats have scored 582 runs. I think that makes 3.85 per game. Marquis, Livo, Lannan, and JORDAN account for about 106 of the team's starts. It just seems really odd that the lowest they've scored when those gents are on the mound is 4.8 runs per 9 innings (which I'm guessing is what your stat measures). That would mean they score almost nothing when anyone else is out there.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I mean, they could be bunching all their runs in the early innings -- when the starter is still in there -- but that would be some serious bunching.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Nats Stats:

    NL Hitting overall .253
    Nats " " .242

    NL Hitting RISP .250
    Nats " " .229

    Ouch.

    An additional thought -- stats like this point to why Davey would prefer the HR to the bunt-and-hit, since we have trouble getting a hit.

    Interesting stat:

    HR's per hit -- NL: .103
    HR's per hit -- Nats: .117

    Which is another stat that tends to show that looking for a big inning with a HR is makes more sense with the Nats than other teams.

    In other words, the Nats are less likely to get a hit than other teams. But when they do get a hit, they are more likely to hit a HR than other teams.

    ReplyDelete
  53. A DC Wonk said...

    They are a power hitting team. That's the problem. You can't have everyone on a team swing for the fences. You get a lot of outs...

    ReplyDelete
  54. Eugene in Oregon said... I found the following “Run Support” nine-inning averages listed for the Nats who have had at least 20 starts:

    Marquis (includes his couple of starts with Arizona): 8.66
    Livo: 5.75
    Lannan: 5.70
    Zimmermann: 4.80


    The 9 inning run support stat doesn't tell the correct story. I think you have to look at the support while the starter is in the game. JZim has the lowest run support of any starter in the Majors while he is in the game.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Yep, Steve's got it. ESPN is taking all the Nats' runs scored in the game, and then treating them as if they all scored while the starter was pitching, then extrapolating that out to 9 innings.

    (This is why you should avoid the Worldwide Leader, Eugene; it will rot your brain.)

    ReplyDelete
  56. All year long just when you think you're getting a break with a pitcher who has a era of +5.00, they shut down the Nationals too. It's not just the Cliff Lees and Wyatt Earp's of the world that get them out, it's the John Smiths and Fred Smoots. I've never seen so many mediocre pitchers go against a team and they can't hit them, especially with RISP. But don't let getting on base fool ya, they don't get on base with regularity either...

    ReplyDelete
  57. I mean, what a hideously awful statistic! Good lord, what is wrong with people? Do they even know what "pitcher of record" means?

    HARRUMPH

    ReplyDelete
  58. From the looks of the line score, the pitchers in this spring training game are much more ready for prime time than the batters.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Who would think anyone but Cy Young himself could keep this potent a lineup scoreless thru 6.

    Davey Johnson and Mike Rizzo, making as many pitchers as they can appear to be great.

    On a bright note, Milone answering some questions, albeit against the Filthies B team, which is essentially AAA.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Good outing by Milone. I would be more excited if HR did this with the Phillies regular lineup.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Let's here it for a great outing by Milone. All the way to striking out Kratz with two on and two out on his 93rd pitch of the day!

    ReplyDelete
  62. Wow, the Nats have a chance to score one run...

    ReplyDelete
  63. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Who's watching the game? Was Lombo's decision to come home on an infield ground ball as dumb as it sounds like?

    ReplyDelete
  65. They are a power hitting team. That's the problem. You can't have everyone on a team swing for the fences. You get a lot of outs...

    You're right. But, it is ironic that, right after you wrote that someone swings for the fences, and gives us three runs! Bernieeeee!

    ReplyDelete
  66. Try again, Good outing by Milone. I would be more excited if HE did this with the Phillies regular lineup.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Way to go Roger!! Maybe Desmond and Morse could learn from him about not swinging at the first pitch with 1st and 3rd and one out.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Monster 3-run homer by Bernadina!!!

    ReplyDelete
  69. HR BERNIE, I love our power hitting team...

    ReplyDelete
  70. I swear all it takes is for me to complain and the Nats score.

    Damn you supermodels why won't you date me? (Hoping it works for that too)

    ReplyDelete
  71. RPrecupjr said...

    Way to go Roger!! Maybe Desmond and Morse could learn from him about not swinging at the first pitch with 1st and 3rd and one out.

    You are so right, I see Beast swinging at many 1st pitches with men in scoring position. Yet, I can't argue too much with his production this season...

    ReplyDelete
  72. Oh, Oh,

    Slaten is in the game. Hide your Women and children.

    ReplyDelete
  73. I agree with a couple of you that the numbers I got from ESPN for run support seemed high, but here's how the ESPN website defines "Run support":

    "Team's runs scored (average, per 9 innings pitched) while the pitcher of record."

    Maybe I'm misreading it, but I took that to be the RS they've giving is essentially equivalent to ERA, i.e. only counting the runs scored while the pitching is pitching, then extrapolating out for a full nine innings.

    If I'm wrong, where can I get a more realistic number? I couldn't find it on a couple of the other stats websites (but I don't belong to some of the 'subscription only' services).

    ReplyDelete
  74. Slaten in.....here we go again....

    ReplyDelete
  75. And if you really want to reward Milone, DON'T put in Doug Slaten!

    ReplyDelete
  76. Game over, Slaten in to pitch. Has he gotten anyone out this season?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Slaten? Really? With 437 relievers he goes with Slaten in a game we could actually win? Here's hoping he pitches and doesn't throw, if you get my drift.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Ohh, SC, you sound sooo hot. Call me sometime, k? Or better yet, just stop by . . .

    ReplyDelete
  79. We've seen this movie before. no?

    ReplyDelete
  80. Bernioe Goes Yard 3-0 Nats until Slaten craps himself

    ReplyDelete
  81. Hey, wait a minute. Slaten's ERA is only 3.00, so he must be good...

    ReplyDelete
  82. Just popped into my office to check the score - nice surprise -- until I saw that Slaten had come in and is promptly trying to give all three runs back. Sheesh. We need to be done with him. Sounds like Milone was awesome!!!

    ReplyDelete
  83. Slaten is another FORS (future open roster slot).

    ReplyDelete
  84. Eugene, JZim at 4.80 ? The guy has a 3.11 ERA so that should mean he would win almost every game.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Doug Slaten can't get lefties or righties out. There's never a good time to use him!

    ReplyDelete
  86. Nats Outsider said...
    Who's watching the game? Was Lombo's decision to come home on an infield ground ball as dumb as it sounds like?


    Outsider, I'm Charlie-and-Dave-ing it, but Desmond was bunting there, probably a safety squeeze, and didn't quite get it far enough up the first base line. Kratz went out and got it and dove back headlong to tag Lombardozzi coming in. Charlie and Dave agree the replay showed him on the plate before the tag, but he was called out. They also thought he didn't get much of a jump off third, and speculated Desmond was bunting on his own.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Seriously... who does Slaten have pictures of? Does he have options left, does anyone know?

    ReplyDelete
  88. Two things: A) I hate it when I'm right, and B) just saw the replay of the (sort of) squeeze play on MLB Gameday, and Lombo was safe by a foot. The Phils have already clinched, you wouldn't think they'd still need help from the morons in blue

    ReplyDelete
  89. UNTERP.NAT said...
    Hey, wait a minute. Slaten's ERA is only 3.00, so he must be good...

    September 20, 2011 3:10 PM


    Not a 3.00 ERA any more! Thanks Slaten and bad Clip. Bye bye win to young Tommy Milone;

    ReplyDelete
  90. OUCH!!

    We didn't need Clip for that. Slaten could have done the exact same thing. :-(

    ReplyDelete
  91. Slaten now has a 4.20 ERA

    ReplyDelete
  92. All in favor of releasing Slaten between games of the doubleheader, say "Aye."

    Aye

    ReplyDelete
  93. Sec 3, even the Phillies' announcers said Lombo was safe

    Captcha was "gleth", the sound I made when I saw Slaten coming in

    ReplyDelete
  94. Slaten. Really? Does Johnson have it in for Milone? Make sure he doesn't get the win? I don't care who is playing or not playing, I would like the Nats to win. I'd like for the manager to make decisions that will help us get there.

    ReplyDelete
  95. I don't care how late in the season it is, send a message, rid the club of Slaten. Show the young guys you need to be accountable for your performance. Allowing him to stay shows once you make the big club you are here until your contract runs out.

    Sad part, I here Davey post game speech..."I thought he was hitting his spots well, he got unlucky, he'll be ready next time"

    ReplyDelete
  96. To be fair, the two hits off him were slow ground balls, one a broken bat. But his option is to update his resume, I think.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Uneffingbelievable

    ReplyDelete
  98. Thanks, Sec 3. And now it looks like that was a run we really needed.

    ReplyDelete
  99. I know what Davey was thinking putting Slaten in. He wanted Milone to learn humility. Slaten=Humility. Milone meet Slaten...

    ReplyDelete
  100. Davey! This is all on you! What were you even thinking with Slaten? He has NEVAH,NEVAH,NEVAH worked out for you! I'm going for a smoothie.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Nats Lose back at 7 pm everybody

    ReplyDelete
  102. My question is why does Davey trot Slaten out? Hasn't he learned? The guy has no future here. There is nothing to be learned from pitching him. This is what we discussed before.

    ReplyDelete
  103. aye. And yesterday was national talk like a pirate day. Seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  104. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  105. LoveDaNats said...
    Davey! This is all on you! What were you even thinking with Slaten? He has NEVAH,NEVAH,NEVAH worked out for you! I'm going for a smoothie.

    September 20, 2011 3:16 PM

    Just wrote that. Cost Milone a win and maybe the team. Hope Clip can vulture a win.

    ReplyDelete
  106. PAY TO PLAY said...

    Slaten now has a 4.20 ERA

    Well, he was good just a few minutes ago when he had a 3.00 ERA. What happened?

    ReplyDelete
  107. Well - that happened at record speed. Thanks , Slaten. Not blaming Clip for this one - there was no way he was ready to come in that fast and there were already 2 on. He can't save the world every day. He has rescued many of the others by stranding their runners, but he can't be expected to be perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  108. I'll see your Ibanez and raise you a Zimmerman.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Don't think of it as a blown lead--think of it as Bernadina hitting a pre-emptive game-tying home run.

    ReplyDelete
  110. There isn't a lead big enough to be safe with Slaten.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Extra innings today? Why not? Let's add a few to the 18 already scheduled. At least Slaten is probably done for the day and can't do any more damage. I am sure tonight's pitcher (?) is happy to know that.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Davey just wanted to stir up the bees nest putting Slaten in. Gotta love it...

    ReplyDelete
  113. Swami,

    Let's not absolve Clip completely. He did give up a dinger on an 0-2 pitch.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Rampant Slaten-hatin! Cuz somebody has to be the goat.

    He gave up two dribblers, and Clippard hung one to Ibañez and scored two inherited runners.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I'd put Slaten in in a 10 to 1 game just to see if he can get out of the inning with a one run lead...

    ReplyDelete
  116. Why isn't someone running for Marrero?

    ReplyDelete
  117. Sec 3, My Sofa said...

    "Don't think of it as a blown lead--think of it as Bernadina hitting a pre-emptive game-tying home run."


    Thanks. I do feel better now.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Eugene, a pitcher can be "pitcher of record' long after he has exited the game. He can leave after 5 innings, losing 5 - 1, and stay the pitcher of record for the rest of the game, which might end up 8 - 6.

    So,there is no way to draw any corellation between Run Support Avg and ERA.

    ReplyDelete
  119. I'm just too good a hitter for my old teammate, Slatey.

    ReplyDelete
  120. jd is right; Clippard screwed up. And that's okay. Let's try to avoid thinking every player has to be either flawless or execrable, okay?

    Also: Eugene, you're not wrong; they're wrong. You understand how the stat is supposed to work, but they're computing it wrong. I actually did the math myself: they're using every run scored during Pitcher X's start, as though all those runs had scored while he was actually in there.

    ReplyDelete
  121. NOT Slaten-hatin! I'm sure he's a perfectly nice boy. I just don't want him pitching for my Nats.

    ReplyDelete
  122. UNTERP.NAT said...
    PAY TO PLAY said...

    Slaten now has a 4.20 ERA

    Well, he was good just a few minutes ago when he had a 3.00 ERA. What happened?

    September 20, 2011 3:22 PM


    Slaten only has 15 innings so add 2 Earnies on him and his record and his 3.00 jumps to 4.20

    So misleading as he was so bad at holding inherited runners.

    ReplyDelete
  123. PAY TO PLAY said...

    Thanks, but I knew that...Some stats can be optical illusions. I was making mirth...

    ReplyDelete
  124. Millions of Americans are out of work. Why, oh why can't Doug Slaten be one of them???

    ReplyDelete
  125. Losing is depressing. The only way I can get through it is by making fun of it. That is all...

    ReplyDelete
  126. You want funny, check this out on Jayson Werth,

    http://www.natsenquirer.com/2011/09/jayson-werth-explains-why-he-sucked-in-2011.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FTheNationalsEnquirer+%28Nats+Enquirer%29

    ReplyDelete
  127. C'mon Flores... this is your second chance

    ReplyDelete
  128. RZ to the rescue once again

    ReplyDelete
  129. I'm rapidly running out of fingernails...

    ReplyDelete
  130. And Pudge gets in a game. Will wonders never cease??

    ReplyDelete
  131. Storen, KardiaK Kids, only 559 saves away from going ahead of Mariano!

    ReplyDelete
  132. YES! Storen! 73! This game was a must win since I feel like the second game won't be so easy with Det pitching. Hope I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  133. The Nats now with 73 wins and the dramatic turnaround in extra innings games with a 12-8 record this year vs. a horrible 3-10 last year.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Looks like a Changing of the guard is happening.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Bang Zoom and another Curly W is in the Books

    ReplyDelete
  136. 3 key coaching decisions in the game

    1) Slaten, 'nuff said
    2) PH for Flores w/ Zim
    3) Intentional walk Utley as the winning runner

    2 of the 3 moves worked. Lesson to Davey, DON'T USE SLATEN ANY MORE!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  137. Got to give it to Gorzo. Ever since his move to the pen he's been very good. A question for many of you. Would you rate Storen as one of the true top 10 closers in baseball?Sure he's got a high number of saves, but as much as I like him, it is an adventure everytime he is out there. I'm worried that his luck gonna run out if he keeps letting guys on base everytime out.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Yay! Nats win!! Listened to most of the first game while working. Did see the 10th inning on the telly. Nice work by the Z-man. No wonder the Phans boo him. :-) Eh, what the heck, let's play another one.

    ReplyDelete
  139. A couple of times ( only a couple), this year Drew blew a save and the team ended up winning. Today, they bailed out Clip. Nice to see the team step up and save them for a change.Clip and Store have saved their a@#$$$# many a time. Good to see the young pitcher doing well. And -- well, Zim -- PAY THE MAN! You know how Drew admired Chad Cordero? Maybe he shouldn't imitate him quite so much!

    ReplyDelete
  140. Steve M,

    I'm with N.Cognito. We should DFA Slaten between games. I mean what a set up. They bring you in to face a light hitting left hander and an infielder hitting below the Mendoza line and you can't get either of them out?

    ReplyDelete
  141. Ano 4:58 - that's just the nature of closers. Everyone feels that way about their closer - unless their name is Mariano Rivera , there is no such thing as a one hundred percent no sweat closer.

    ReplyDelete
  142. I'm pretty down. Sorry about losing the lead. Guess I'm spending next year in Syracuse.

    ReplyDelete
  143. You slay me, Doug S. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  144. New post - another game is just around the corner. What do you say we beat Cliff Lee tonight?

    ReplyDelete
  145. How fun to be able to read your comments. The ONLY thing that made it at all bearable when Slaten took the mound was knowing that my pain was shared by my imaginary friends. I was not disappointed, and I laughed out loud a lot. And may that be the last we see of him in a Nats uni.

    Thank goodness for other good pitching. And J. Zimm.

    Let's get another, whaddya say? Capcha is gnite so I think we win.

    ReplyDelete